Skip to content

California Judge to Dismiss Part of Copyright Lawsuit Against Meta's Llama AI, Offers Authors Chance to Amend Claims

A California federal judge has announced plans to dismiss a portion of the copyright lawsuit filed by comedian Sarah Silverman and other authors against Meta Platforms over its AI system, Llama.

In a significant development, a California federal judge has signaled his intention to dismiss a segment of the copyright lawsuit brought by comedian Sarah Silverman and fellow authors against Meta Platforms. The lawsuit centers on Meta's AI system, Llama, with the judge expressing readiness to grant Meta's motion to dismiss specific allegations related to copyright infringement arising from Llama's text generation capabilities. While addressing these concerns, the judge also conveyed his willingness to allow the authors to amend the majority of their claims.

The judge, U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria, stated that he would dismiss the authors' claims regarding the copyright infringement arising from the text generated by Meta's AI system, Llama. This marks a noteworthy development in the ongoing legal battle.

Despite the dismissal, the judge indicated that the authors would be granted permission to amend most of their claims. This provides the authors with an opportunity to refine and strengthen their legal arguments.

While the judge signaled potential dismissal of certain claims, he acknowledged the authors' central theory that Meta violated their rights by using their books as part of the data to train Llama. The core issue revolves around the unauthorized use of copyrighted works in training AI systems.

The lawsuit against Meta is part of a broader trend where copyright owners take legal action against tech companies over the use of generative AI systems. A central question in these cases revolves around the permissibility of using copyrighted works without authorization for AI training.

Judge Chhabria expressed skepticism regarding the authors' claim that Llama's output infringed their copyrights, casting doubt on the notion that the generated text copies or resembles their original works.

The legal landscape surrounding AI copyright challenges is evolving, with various cases raising fundamental questions about the boundaries of unauthorized use and the transformative nature of AI-generated content.

The judge's decision to dismiss part of the copyright lawsuit against Meta's Llama AI system reflects the complexity of legal challenges in the intersection of AI and intellectual property. As the authors are granted an opportunity to amend their claims, the case continues to shape the legal narrative surrounding AI and copyright in the tech industry.

As the legal debate unfolds, the evolving landscape of AI and copyright presents intricate questions that hold implications for both technology companies and content creators.

Read more about Meta's Llama:

Llama and the Rise of Open Source AI: The Game-Changer of 2023

Meta's Limited Openness with Llama 2: Balancing AI Innovation and Business Protection