Skip to content

Hollywood Screenwriters Secure Guardrails Against AI in Labor Battle

After a 148-day strike, Hollywood screenwriters have won significant concessions concerning the use of artificial intelligence in scriptwriting. The Writers Guild of America's negotiations shed light on the growing concerns over AI in creative industries.

Hollywood screenwriters have emerged victorious after a 148-day strike, with one of their most significant wins being the imposition of guardrails against the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in scriptwriting. This landmark labor battle has put the spotlight on AI's role in creative industries, setting a precedent for future negotiations in an era increasingly defined by automation.

During the lengthy strike, one issue stood out above all: the use of AI in scriptwriting. What initially seemed like a minor demand from the Writers Guild of America (WGA) evolved into a pivotal rallying point. This conflict highlighted the evolving landscape of AI's role in creative work, transcending mere economic negotiations.

AI's intrusion into the creative process transformed the strike from an economic battle into a human-versus-machine conflict, resonating across various industries grappling with automation. The writers' victory has set a precedent for addressing the human impact of AI-driven automation.

The tentative agreement stipulates that studios and production companies must disclose whether AI-generated material has been used in part or in full. AI cannot be credited as a writer, write "literary material," or serve as source material.

AI-generated content cannot undermine a writer's credit or separated rights, ensuring that human writers retain their creative recognition and financial entitlements.

The deal acknowledges that AI can be a valuable tool in filmmaking, permitting writers to use AI with a company's consent. However, it explicitly states that a writer cannot be compelled to use AI software, emphasizing the importance of human-AI collaboration.

The agreement recognizes the rapidly evolving legal and technological landscape surrounding generative AI. Both parties have agreed to meet regularly during the contract's term to adapt to these changes, demonstrating the dynamic nature of AI in creative work.

The contract does not prohibit studios from using scripts they own to train AI systems, leaving these concerns to the legal system. This unresolved aspect mirrors the growing concerns in the literary world, where authors have alleged large-scale copyright infringement by AI.

Experts view the WGA's agreement as a potential model for labor battles in various content-creation industries. The deal promotes AI-human collaboration, offering a blueprint for addressing AI's impact on creative work.

The SAG-AFTRA actors union, currently on strike, is also grappling with AI's implications, particularly in the realm of compensation and AI-generated likenesses. AI labor disputes are expected to expand to other creative industries.

The Writers Guild of America's successful strike, driven in part by concerns over AI in scriptwriting, marks a pivotal moment in addressing the human impact of automation in creative industries. The agreement's provisions establish guardrails for AI's role, emphasizing collaboration over replacement. As AI continues to reshape creative work, this victory is likely the first of many labor disputes to come, necessitating ongoing discussions and adaptation.